Complete
Change of Mind:
The Nissan Cefiro
Long-Term Test Update
Written
By Tamago Photos by Tamago and Redline
After being lambasted in our December 1998 Long-Term Test / Review,
the Nissan Cefiro seems to have turned into a very different vehicle completely.
The first 22,000 kms. has been nothing but headaches for us, but the next
10,000 kms. went on smoothly. Too smoothly in fact, that in no time,
we found the odometer registering 33,000 kms!
The initial problems with the air conditioning unit and wood panelling
seem to have been fixed by Nissan Gallery in Ortigas. However, even when
the ECU was replaced with a new one, the fuel knocking problem still persisted.
It was only when we contacted Shell Pilipinas that we found out that
unleaded gasoline was only 91 octane. Since the Nissan Cefiro needed at
least 95 octane, we switched to Shell Velocity (97 octane), and this seems
to have solved the problem.
After clocking more than 30,000 kms., the car's construction came into
some criticism. First of all, the doorlocks and trunk lid became very difficult
to open with the key. A spray of WD-40 didn't seem to help (good thing
this car had keyless entry). Also, the car experienced a weird incident
of leaking via the passenger door. The leak was so bad that it soaked the
padded A-pillars and the front speaker as well. We've been trying to trace
the cause, and we found that the door's rubber panelling came loose, and
the metal sandwiched in the rubber already had signs of rust! (so much
for the so-called triple sealed doors)
The biggest problem we've encountered is the car's alarm system. It
errored no less than three times, sounding off even if the Cefiro's computerized
key is used to open the doors and start the engine. So far it has only
caused embarrassment for us, but nothing more serious than that.
Overall, the Nissan Cefiro has transformed itself during the past 10,000
kms. It has become more mature and refined.
Marque and Model: 1997 Nissan
Cefiro
Total Distance Travelled:
Distance covered after last
update:
Engine: 2.0 DOHC 24V V6
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Performance: 155 bhp at
6400 / 190 Nm at 4400.
Average fuel consumption: 7
kms. / liter
Pros: Spacious, sleek, luxurious
interior; silky-smooth V6 engine; great ergonomics, easy to drive; great
sounding radio system.
Cons: Lifeless steering;
bland exterior.
Problems Encountered: Leaking
near A-pillars; problematic keyholes; alarm system going crazy; pathetic
dealer service. |
P.S. Nissan service is still TOTALLY BAD. Perhaps a complete re-training
of personnel is necessary. Incompetence is still high on their list.
|
 |
| Though the Cefiro doesn't have the looks to make
people stare, its sleekness is still a pleasant sight to look at. The big
car's agility, acceleration and braking are also surprising good. |
 |
| The 2.0 DOHC 24V V6 VQ engine still provides silky-smooth
performance with reliability. Fuel knocking problem is gone thanks to Shell's
97-octane Velocity. |
 |
| Ugghh...keyholes begin to lock-up. Magical WD-40
doesn't help. Too much keyless entry use? Maybe. |
|